Main content start

Team Dynamics

On a team of eight, three people get 67% of the airtime.
Melissa Thomas-Hunt

Research shows that harnessing the unique expertise of team members is one of the most important factors in creating high-performing teams. Darden Business Professor Melissa Thomas-Hunt documents the dynamics that undermine team performance and shares the ways that you can overcome the barriers to success both as a team leader and member.

discussion icon speaking bubbles

Discussion Guide

Use the free discussion guide to reflect on key takeaways from what you've seen or to start the conversation after watching the video with friends or colleagues.

Key Takeaways

Successful teams harness the expertise of all members.

Teams are formed to solve a problem, make a critical decision, or fix a situation. A successful team brings together a diverse set of people with experiences and expertise to uncover new solutions. The more effective the team is in using unique perspectives, the more successful the team.

Team performance is negatively impacted when a team makes false assumptions about what’s important.

Two roadblocks get in the way of effective team performance.

  1. Common Knowledge Effect is when teams spend more time discussing the common knowledge known by all members, as opposed to the unique knowledge individual team members bring to finding solutions.
  2. Over-Weighting Status is when teams give more weight to the perspective of higher status team members and pay less attention to ideas offered by lower status team members.
Airtime matters

The research is clear that the amount of time spent talking in a meeting amounts to “getting credit” for contributing to the team’s outcome. Those who talk the most, get the most credit. Don’t talk just to talk — talk strategically. Silence prevents the team from benefitting from your knowledge. By speaking up and using airtime wisely, you increase the odds that your team will hear your contributions.

Supporting eachother makes teams more effective.

Supporting and advocating for the voices of lower status members of the team will increase your standing.

In a team setting, women’s expertise is more heavily scrutinized, especially in stereotypically male-dominated domains. However, when another member of the group asks a woman expert to contribute her perspective, she is seen as more influential and competent. This is a double win, as the person who solicits her expertise is also viewed more favorably.

Three strategies for getting more out of your teams.
  1. Share your expertise. Good team outcomes rely on leveraging the expertise of all team members, including your own. If your knowledge is not being heard in meetings, find a trusted teammate and commit to supporting each other:
    • Jumping into the conversation early.
    • Repeating what you said if it goes unheard.
    • Giving evidence supporting your points.
    • Remember, airtime translates into perceived influence. Get credit for your ideas so your contributions can be leveraged and heard.
  2. Enlist early support. Early support, especially with new ideas, can help get your expertise heard in team meetings. With this same trusted teammate, find a few more members of your team and share your ideas ahead of a formal meeting. Let them know how you formulated this point so they can support you once everyone is together.
  3. Engage others. As a team leader, draw out your quieter team members, especially those who may have unique knowledge. Ensure all members get their share of airtime and prevent valuable ideas from being discounted. You can help fill in the gaps when team members forget to bring their expertise to the team discussion.
    • At any level — member or leader — you can solicit input from others. This validates their expertise and elevates your status in the meeting.
Great leaders create team environments where all voices are heard.

The most effective teams create a culture where individuals feel their ideas are heard. Expect every team member to contribute ideas and expertise to decisions.

Additional Information

View Team Dynamics Resources

Read more about Team Dynamics:

  • When what you know is not enough: Melissa Thomas-Hunt and Katherine Phillips explore the role of gender dynamics in the expression of expertise, finding that gender expectations interfere with the expression, perception, and use of expertise.
  • What makes teams smarter? More women: Anita Woolley and Thomas Malone find little correlation between a group’s collective intelligence and the IQs of its individual members, but its collective intelligence rises if a group includes more women.
  • Managing Yourself: Bringing out the best in your people: The Harvard Business Review summarizes a research project studying the difference between leaders who multiply intelligence among their employees and those who diminish it.
  • Introverts Make Great Leaders Too: New research on leadership and group dynamics from the Wharton School challenges the assumption that extroverts make the best leaders.
  • Why Teams Don't Work: J. Richard Hackman, a leading expert in teams at Harvard University, reveals why teams aren't always the best way to get a job done.
  • Coming Through When it Matters Most: Harvard Business Review presents research about how teams do their best work under pressure.
View Team Dynamics References

Who Takes the Floor and Why: Gender, Power, and Volubility in Organizations

Brescoll, V. L. 2011. "Who Takes the Floor and Why: Gender, Power, and Volubility in Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 4: 622-641.

Why Teams Don’t Work: An Interview with J. Richard Hackman

Coutu, Diane. 2009. "Why Teams Don’t Work: An Interview with J. Richard Hackman." Harvard Business Review, 87: 98-105.

Coming through when it matters most: how great teams do their best work under pressure

Gardner, Heidi. 2012. "Coming through when it matters most: how great teams do their best work under pressure." Harvard Business Review, 90: 82-91.

Why teams don't work

Hackman, J. R. 1998. Chapter 12 in Theory and Research on Small Groups, edited by R. Scott Tindale et al. Plenum Press, New York.

Expertise in your midst: How congruence between status and speech style affects reactions to unique knowledge

Lewin-Loyd, D., Phillips, K.W., Whitson, J., and Thomas-Hunt, M. 2010. "Expertise in your midst: How congruence between status and speech style affects reactions to unique knowledge." Group Processes Intergroup Relations, vol. 13 no. 3: 379-395.

Accuracy and Perceived Expert Status in Group Decisions: When Minority Members Make Majority Members More Accurate Privately

Sinaceur, M., Thomas-Hunt, M.C., Neale, M.A., O’Neill, O.A., and Haag, C. 2010. "Accuracy and Perceived Expert Status in Group Decisions: When Minority Members Make Majority Members More Accurate Privately." Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin,

When Timeliness Matters: The Effect of Status on Reactions to Perceived Time Delay Within Distributed Collaboration

Sheldon, O.J., Thomas-Hunt, M.C., and Proell, C.A. 2006. "When Timeliness Matters: The Effect of Status on Reactions to Perceived Time Delay Within Distributed Collaboration." Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 91 no. 6: 1385-1395.

When what you know is not enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups

Thomas-Hunt, M., and Phillips, K.W. 2004. "When what you know is not enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 30 no. 12: 1585-1598.

Who’s really sharing? The context dependent effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups

Thomas-Hunt, M.C., Ogden, T.Y., and Neale, M.A. 2003. "Who’s really sharing? The context dependent effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups." Management Science, vol. 49 no. 4: 464-477.

Giving her the floor: How solicitation helps female experts be more influential

under review (unpublished)

Taking the lead: The effects of power distribution on information sharing and team performance

working paper (unpublished)

Biographies