Creating a Level Playing Field
Create effective workplaces where all people can thrive.
In many ways, the playing field of work is still tilted in favor of men. Stanford Professor and Faculty Director, Stanford VMware Women's Leadership Innovation Lab, Dr. Shelley Correll explains how errors in judgment and evaluation contribute to a gap in opportunities for women. Evaluations are the gatekeepers to opportunities, promotions, and recognition. It’s natural to look for shortcuts with so much information to process every day. However, when you rely on your gut instincts as a shortcut to make decisions, mistakes can happen. In this talk, Correll explains how to create solutions that scrutinize the ways individuals and organizations make decisions about people and relationships in order to reduce errors. Doing so, you'll create environments where people have opportunities to do their best and be recognized for their work.

Discussion Guide
Use the free discussion guide to reflect on key takeaways from what you've seen or to start the conversation after watching the video with friends or colleagues
Key Takeaways
Stereotypes are widely held, generalized beliefs about people.
Stereotypes act as cognitive shortcuts when processing information and can lead to bias, or errors in decision-making.
Ways Gender Stereotypes Create Bias Against Women
Create a harsher standard for women. Stereotypes can lead us to doubt women’s expertise. As a result, their performance is more heavily scrutinized, and they are required to repeatedly prove their competence.
- Shift the criteria used to evaluate women in order to justify a more stereotypical decision.
- Create a backlash for women who do not meet our stereotypical expectations.
Six Strategies to Reduce Bias
- Educate yourself and decision makers on bias. Raising awareness can reduce reliance on stereotypes
- Establish clear criteria in advance of making decisions
- Scrutinize the criteria being used. Are these the right criteria for the decision? Or, do they unintentionally screen out certain candidates or outcomes?
- Hold decision makers—and yourself—accountable. Explain decisions about people to others.
- Be transparent in progress toward goals. Post numbers and keep track of progress
- Vouch for the competence of all women, especially women leaders. Talk about their accomplishments, skills and contributions as a means to counter bias.
Additional Information
View Creating a Level Playing Field Resources
Read more about Creating a Level Playing Field:
- Project Implicit: This Project Implicit association test reveals how much unconscious bias users have against or towards particular groups.
- Winning the Talent War for Women: A Harvard Business School research project explains how Deloitte fostered a more inclusive workforce and reduced turnover among women by reducing stereotypical biases.
- Why Gender Equality Stalled: A New York Times opinion piece explains how stereotypes play a role in stalling progress toward gender equality.
- Why Work Sucks and How to Fix It: The Results-Only Revolution: Author Cali Ressler explains how "results-only" work environments can make employees happier while delivering improved business results.
- The Corporate Lattice: Achieving High Performance In the Changing World of Work: Authors Cathleen Benko and Molly Anderson argue for thinking about work as a "lattice" rather than a "ladder" — a structure that supports a flexible, collaborative, and dynamic work environment.
View Creating a Level Playing Field References
Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of ‘blind’ auditions on female musicians.
Goldin, Claudia and Cecilia Rouse. 2000. “Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of ‘blind’ auditions on female musicians.” The American Economic Review 90: 715-741.
Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management
Rudman, L. A. 1998. "Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,629-645.
The impact of gender on the review of curriculum vitae of job applicants and tenure Candidates: A national empirical study
Steinpreis, Rhea E., Katie A. Anders and Dawn Ritzke. 1999. “The impact of gender on the review of curriculum vitae of job applicants and tenure Candidates: A national empirical study.” Sex Roles 41: 509-528.
Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination
Uhlmann, E. and Cohen, G.L. 2005. "Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination." Psychological Science 16(6):474-80.